Why Change Leadership and Change Management Break Down in AEC
Most AEC leaders don’t struggle with vision.
They struggle with what comes after the vision is announced — when change management moves from theory to reality, strategy must turn into action, and change leadership is tested in real time.
The town hall goes well. The strategy deck is solid. The future state makes sense.
And then… momentum fades.
Initiatives stall. Teams revert to familiar habits. Leaders start pushing harder. And suddenly the same people who were once “aligned” are now labeled as resistant.
This is often where change initiatives in AEC quietly break down — not because the vision is flawed, but because change leadership and change management behaviors were never intentionally designed to sustain momentum.
Vision sets direction.
Leadership behavior creates movement.
The Vision–Execution Gap in AEC
In the AEC industry, change is no longer episodic — it’s constant.
Alternative delivery models.
New technologies.
Increasing client expectations.
Tighter margins.
Less certainty.
As pressure increases, leaders often respond by trying to get clearer, faster, and more decisive.
But here’s the paradox AEC leaders face:
The more uncertainty people experience, the less momentum command-and-control leadership creates.
At the core, most breakdowns between vision and execution don’t happen because teams fail to understand the strategy. Instead, they happen because leaders underestimate the human dynamics of leading change in complex environments.
This shows up far beyond AEC. Research across industries confirms that this execution gap is widespread; and in construction and engineering, the consequences are amplified by high risk and interdependence.
The data backs this up. According to McKinsey & Company, nearly 70% of change initiatives fail, most often due to employee resistance and lack of leadership alignment — not flawed strategy or poor planning.
Why Strategy Alone Doesn’t Create Movement
Across many AEC organizations, a familiar pattern emerges during transformation efforts:
- Leaders clearly communicate what is changing
- They articulate why it matters
- They assign owners, timelines, and milestones
And yet, progress slows.
The issue isn’t intelligence, experience, or technical capability.
Momentum during change doesn’t come from clarity alone.
It comes from choice, control, trust, and psychological ownership.
People don’t move because they were told where to go.
They move when they feel trusted enough — and supported enough — to step into uncertainty.
The Three Places Momentum Breaks Down
1. Too Much Control, Not Enough Ownership
When schedules tighten and risk increases, leaders often default to control as a safety mechanism.
More approvals.
Increasing rules.
Forced Compliance to “just following the process.”
But control slows learning — and successful strategy execution in AEC depends on learning faster than certainty allows.
This aligns with findings from Prosci, whose research consistently shows that people-centered change approaches significantly outperform directive, top-down implementations.
When leaders prioritize compliance over commitment, adoption slows — even when the strategy itself is sound.
2. Waiting for Perfect Clarity
Many leaders delay action until every detail is fully defined.
In periods of uncertainty and organizational change, that moment rarely arrives.
Momentum is built with just enough clarity — not perfect answers.
Clarity creates direction.
Learning creates movement.
3. Systems That Reward the Old Way
Even the strongest strategies struggle when performance metrics, incentives, or workflows continue to reinforce yesterday’s behaviors.
People don’t follow strategy documents.
They follow what the system consistently rewards.
Execution data reinforces this reality.
The Project Management Institute has found that projects with active, engaged leadership sponsorship are far more likely to meet their original goals and timelines.
Momentum during change depends less on better plans — and more on visible, consistent leadership behavior once execution begins.
How AEC Leaders Turn Vision Into Momentum
Turning vision into action doesn’t require another tool, framework, or initiative.
It requires a shift in how leaders show up while change is unfolding.
1. Create Choice Where Possible
Momentum accelerates when people experience agency within clear boundaries.
Effective change leaders in AEC explicitly define:
- What is non-negotiable
- How teams can experiment and adapt
- Where input is expected — not just compliance
Choice builds ownership.
Ownership builds commitment.
2. Make the Work Visible — Not Just the Goal
Vision lives in the future.
Momentum lives in day-to-day behavior.
Leaders who sustain momentum:
- Translate strategy into observable actions
- Talk openly about learning, not just outcomes
- Normalize adjustment instead of perfection
Research from Harvard Business School shows that teams perform better in complex, uncertain environments when leaders create conditions where people feel safe to raise concerns, ask questions, and learn in real time.
When learning is visible, momentum becomes sustainable — not performative.
3. Model the Behavior Being Requested
Teams pay close attention to how leaders behave under pressure.
When leaders:
- Avoid difficult conversations
- Default to familiar habits
- Rush prematurely toward certainty
Momentum quietly erodes.
When leaders remain curious, ask better questions, and slow down when it matters — teams follow.
The Leadership Shift Many AEC Firms Avoid
Most AEC firms are highly capable at driving change.
The firms that thrive long-term are learning how to create conditions for change.
Insight from Deloitte suggests that leaders who balance direction with adaptability are better positioned to sustain performance through ongoing disruption.
That shift requires leaders to loosen the illusion of control and build stronger relationships with uncertainty — starting with their own leadership behavior.
Vision sets direction.
Leadership creates momentum.
Final Thought
When a strategy feels sound but momentum feels slow, the question isn’t what’s wrong with the plan.
The better question is:
What behaviors is the current environment actually encouraging right now?
That question — asked consistently — is where meaningful, durable change begins.
References
- McKinsey & Company – Research on transformation success and leadership alignment
- Prosci – Best practices in people-centered change management
- Project Management Institute (PMI) – Pulse of the Profession reports on leadership and execution
- Harvard Business School – Research on psychological safety, learning, and team performance
- Deloitte Insights – Leadership, adaptability, and organizational agility research
Engage Ryan to be your next keynote speaker
Ryan's Keynotes are the sparks of insight and relatable stories that function as connective tissue that helps ignite your curiosity, allowing you to begin building a stronger relationship to change.
